The first change has been made to paragraph 1.6 which now advises general practitioners to check whether the vet they are referring a case to is on the RCVS Specialist or Advanced Practitioner list, explaining the difference to the client and what sets them apart from other vets who might be prepared to accept a referral.
Also, practitioners who accept a referral should provide information to the referrer about the experience and status of those likely to be responsible for the case.
The guidance about conflicts of interest in paragraph 1.7 has also been amended such that referring surgeons should tell clients if they are referring their case to a practice owned by the same group.
There is new guidance about how vets and nurses talk about referral practitioners, with the new advice being to focus on accepted terms such as 'RCVS Specialist' and 'RCVS Advanced Practitioner', and avoid more general terms like 'referral surgeon' or 'consultant' to avoid confusion or implying that individuals hold more qualifications than they do.
Lastly, there is new guidance that vets may only use the name 'Specialist' in the name of their practice where there is genuine and meaningful involvement, and oversight, in case management by at least one RCVS specialist in all disciplines where any clinical services are offered under the business name.
https://www.rcvs.org.uk/setting-standards/advice-and-guidance/code-of-professional-conduct-for-veterinary-surgeons/supporting-guidance/referrals-and-second-opinions/
PS: Whilst you're here, take a moment to see our latest job opportunities for vets.
You say ‘now advises general practitioners to check that the vet they are referring a case to is on the RCVS Specialist or Advanced Practitioner list’ which suggests that cases should be referred to specialists or Aps, where the code actually says ‘whether’ they are on such a list (presumably more so you don’t call them a specialist or ap if they aren’t)
Rob Loxley, sorry, I didn’t mean to imply that, but rather to say that if they are referring to Specialists or APs, then they should check that they are on the list, going on to explain that they should also explain what sets them apart from non-APs and Specialists, thereby making it clear that referrals do not HAVE to be referred to APs and Specialists. But you’re right, ‘whether’ is less open to misinterpretation and I will amend it! Thanks.