The RCVS has advised that veterinary surgeons should delegate Schedule 3 work to veterinary nurse students only during students' training, following a series of queries from employers about such students locuming.
Veterinary surgeons have dispensations under Schedule 3 of the Veterinary Surgeons Act to delegate to student veterinary nurses in the course of their training, so that students can learn how to give medical treatments to animals.
Crucially, these dispensations apply only when the student is working as a student in their approved training practice or on a placement organised by their university, and is under the supervision of qualified staff.
These dispensations do not apply to any extra-curricula activity so, if working as locums, they are legally classified as unqualified lay staff
The RCVS is concerned that locum agencies do not always appear to know this and are placing locums in their capacity as students, or even "senior students." This has the potential to mislead employers and the students concerned, and result in illegal practice.
Liz Branscombe, Chairman of the RCVS Veterinary Nurses Council said: "We know that student VNs, especially those on university courses, often undertake locum work to supplement their earnings. However, beyond the training practice which employs them, or in a placement organised by their university, they can only carry out tasks that may be expected of an unqualified staff member, and cannot legally undertake Schedule 3 work."
Practices may check the details of a student VN directly with the RCVS or with the student's college. If you notice an agency promoting student VN locums, please contact the RCVS so that we can provide guidance.
PS: Whilst you're here, take a moment to see our latest job opportunities for vets.
Good "Nurses " undertaking tasks which they are not legally allowed to is something about which I have felt very strongly throughout my career
Wynne
Yes, Wynne, fair enough, I am sure that we all know of competent but uncertificated persons doing such work (possibly more prevalent in the past than now) but are you saying that you disapprove of them doing the work or criticising the present restrictions placed upon them?
Tim.
Sorry Tim I've just realised I've had an illiterate moment, and my posting was as clear as mud
I meant Good I'm glad RCVS are doing something to curb illegal acts by "nursing " staff (at long last ) I disapprove of anyone undertaking acts of veterinary surgery unless they are on the Register, or there is a derogation in the Act
Thanks for the clarification, Wynne. I didn't think that you were condoning illegal acts but your comment was a bit ambiguous!
Regards.