Two new campaigns which call on the veterinary profession to unite against the practice of homeopathy have been launched this week.
Both campaigns raise concerns about the ethics of veterinary surgeons using irrational, unscientific and ineffective remedies to treat ill animals or in place of conventional vaccinations.
The Campaign For Rational Veterinary Medicine presents the case against homeopathy on a new microsite, and asks the profession to unite around a call for the Royal College of Veterinary Surgeons to issue a public position statement that homeopathy is ineffective in animals, bringing it into line with the NHS, the findings of the British government's own review of homeopathy, and the BVA.
The campaign also asks that veterinary surgeons who prescribe homeopathic remedies be required to get owners to sign a consent form, prepared by the College, giving the College’s views on the ineffectiveness of homeopathy.
Lastly, the campaign asks that promotion or advertising of homeopathy by veterinary surgeons should abide by Advertising Standards Authority regulations and carry a statement from the College.
The Campaign for Rational Veterinary Medicine has been set up by a group of practitioners including the BSAVA Past President, Mike Jessop, Alex Gough, Martin Whitehead, Niall Taylor, Phil Hyde, Martin Atkinson and Brennen McKenzie, supported by VetSurgeon.org Editor, Arlo Guthrie. It also has the support of the noted author, academic and erstwhile dog owner, Professor Edzard Ernst.
Arlo said: "This is not just about the ethics of prescribing or tolerating the practice of prescribing water to animals that are dependent on us. There are 13m pet owning households in the UK. As well as visiting the vet, they will all be patients at some stage in their lives. So what you and the College say about homeopathy in animals has the potential to affect the choices they make for themselves too. Think how much money and false hope you could save them, and the consequent benefit to human welfare."
By complete coincidence, another campaign against veterinary homeopathy was launched last week. This one, by Danny Chambers MRCVS goes further, calling for a complete ban on the prescription of homeopathic remedies by veterinary surgeons. The petition has already gathered over 750 supporters.
Arlo said: "I think it’s important to say that the two petitions are not mutually exclusive. If you think both represent acceptable solutions, then sign both!"
Visit the Campaign for Rational Veterinary Medicine here, and sign the petition here.
Sign Danny Chambers' petition on change.org here.
PS: Whilst you're here, take a moment to see our latest job opportunities for vets.
Many people who are sceptical about veterinary homeopathy have studied a lot of the papers put forward as evidence by homeopaths in great detail and they present consistently as being of poor quality or even, in some cases as not even saying what the homeopaths claim they say. Martin Whitehead has reviewed a couple of the more significant papers here [http://tinyurl.com/jm8w7zr] and here [http://tinyurl.com/jm8w7zr]. I have also spent some time looking at the long lists produced by some of the homeopathic groups out there. You can read the critiques here [www.rationalvetmed.org/the%20best%20they%20can%20do.html], and there are more papers also considered here [www.rationalvetmed.org/academic%20papers.html]. Jan, I would greatly appreciate your comment on the information given in the links but I don't think it's fair to criticise those who have found homeopathy wanting by claiming they haven't looked at the evidence - we have!
Of course, for every one paper that is painstakingly analysed and critiqued, it's easy for a homeopath just to throw in another ten claiming that they too, offer proof. It's a never ending task so long as homeopaths are prepared to accept poor quality research and claim it supports their position.
The BAHVS have produced a list of 800 papers which they claim support the idea that homeopathy works. I'm no more hopeful they will prove to be any more convincing than the ones dealy with above, but if you'd like to critique them I'd be genuinely interested in your opinion of them.
Niall