Two new campaigns which call on the veterinary profession to unite against the practice of homeopathy have been launched this week.
Both campaigns raise concerns about the ethics of veterinary surgeons using irrational, unscientific and ineffective remedies to treat ill animals or in place of conventional vaccinations.
The Campaign For Rational Veterinary Medicine presents the case against homeopathy on a new microsite, and asks the profession to unite around a call for the Royal College of Veterinary Surgeons to issue a public position statement that homeopathy is ineffective in animals, bringing it into line with the NHS, the findings of the British government's own review of homeopathy, and the BVA.
The campaign also asks that veterinary surgeons who prescribe homeopathic remedies be required to get owners to sign a consent form, prepared by the College, giving the College’s views on the ineffectiveness of homeopathy.
Lastly, the campaign asks that promotion or advertising of homeopathy by veterinary surgeons should abide by Advertising Standards Authority regulations and carry a statement from the College.
The Campaign for Rational Veterinary Medicine has been set up by a group of practitioners including the BSAVA Past President, Mike Jessop, Alex Gough, Martin Whitehead, Niall Taylor, Phil Hyde, Martin Atkinson and Brennen McKenzie, supported by VetSurgeon.org Editor, Arlo Guthrie. It also has the support of the noted author, academic and erstwhile dog owner, Professor Edzard Ernst.
Arlo said: "This is not just about the ethics of prescribing or tolerating the practice of prescribing water to animals that are dependent on us. There are 13m pet owning households in the UK. As well as visiting the vet, they will all be patients at some stage in their lives. So what you and the College say about homeopathy in animals has the potential to affect the choices they make for themselves too. Think how much money and false hope you could save them, and the consequent benefit to human welfare."
By complete coincidence, another campaign against veterinary homeopathy was launched last week. This one, by Danny Chambers MRCVS goes further, calling for a complete ban on the prescription of homeopathic remedies by veterinary surgeons. The petition has already gathered over 750 supporters.
Arlo said: "I think it’s important to say that the two petitions are not mutually exclusive. If you think both represent acceptable solutions, then sign both!"
Visit the Campaign for Rational Veterinary Medicine here, and sign the petition here.
Sign Danny Chambers' petition on change.org here.
PS: Whilst you're here, take a moment to see our latest job opportunities for vets.
Hi Jan,
You ask how many people who signed the petition actually know what homeopathy really is.
I suspect, like you, not many really understand how implausible it really is.
Homeopathy asks us to believe that a very large variety of substances, including condoms, placenta (welsh), light from the planet Venus and Hadrian's Wall has been proven to cause certain symptoms, and by extension is indicated for the treatment of disease. It further demands that we believe that if you dilute these substances till not one single molecule remains, the remedy is made more effective.
In addition, it asks that we ignore the vast body of scientific evidence which has proven homeopathy ineffective.
There is no 'good evidence' that homeopathy is an effective treatment for anything. There is good evidence that the human mind is hugely fallible, and when evaluating the efficacy of treatment, we seek to affirm our own beliefs (confirmation bias) and often ignore other factors like regression to the mean.
And that, actually, answers your question about 'why homeopathy'. What better example to demonstrate the fallibility of the human mind than with a treatment which so many people believe in despite the vast weight of evidence to the contrary.
As to whether there are more important issues to campaign about. Sure. Antibiotics? Definitely. Wholeheartedly agree with you. That doesn't make this unimportant. On the contrary, I personally believe that the campaign could have a profoundly beneficial effect outside the veterinary profession, and into the field of human healthcare.
Our campaign is not about bashing anyone. It's not personal. It's about critical analysis. Homeopathy should not be above that.