John Kenward MRCVS, a director of Maidstone practice Pet Emergency Treatment Services, has been given a conditional discharge for allowing an employee to X-ray her own foot after a horse stamped on it.
Maidstone Magistrates heard that the employee, a 25 year-old vet and equine intern, was afraid the foot was broken and she might be unable to do that evening's on-call duty.
As a result, she rang Mr Kenward. As they were both concerned she could be held up in hospital A&E, Mr Kenward suggested she use the in-house X-ray kit. He gave her the settings to use and she carried out the test, which showed no break so she continued to work as normal.
Another director, who acts as Radiation Protection Supervisor, later noticed a human image on the digital processor. This led him to notify other practice board members of his intention to interview staff about the suspected breach of site radiation safety policy. He was immediately told by Mr Kenward not to discipline the vet intern as he had suggested that she use the X-ray.
As a result the Health and Safety Executive was contacted and an investigation confirmed a breach of radiation regulations.
Although the vet intern, from Maidstone, was the only person present during the X-ray exposure, she did not wear a personal dosemeter during the procedure.
However, HSE told the court that Mr Kenward was fully aware that the rules of the practice clearly stated nobody should be placed within the beam of the X-ray machine.
Mr Kenward was ordered to pay £1,296 in costs after admitting a breach of the Health and Safety at Work etc Act 1974.
After the hearing, HSE inspector Rob Hassell said: "Any vet practice using ionising radiation for medical exposures must ensure that the X-ray equipment is properly maintained and that the requirements of the Ionising Radiations Regulations are complied with. The view of HSE and the Department of Health is that it is highly unlikely that all these conditions can be met by a veterinary practice.
"It follows therefore that X-rays must not be taken of human beings at practices. We are aware that the X-raying of people may not be unique to this particular practice so I hope others will take note that HSE is prepared to prosecute if such breaches come to light."
PS: Whilst you're here, take a moment to see our latest job opportunities for vets.
The HSE inspector should be asked to clarify the statement "it is highly unlikely that all these conditions can be met by a veterinary practice."
Wynne
I agree. We definitely have to ensure the machines are properly maintained and surely we are also obliged to meet the ionising radiations regulations isn't that what our RPA is checking when they come in? As an employee I admit I am not involved in that side of things (apart from the day to day requirements) but that is what I would assume.
I also agree. I think Mr Hassell should clarify his statement. Our X-ray equipment is maintained according to manufacturers guidelines and Ionising Radiations Regulations are complied with. This was also checked as part of our tier 2 RCVS Practice Standards. Presumably the intern was in breach of guidelines (or contract!) for failing to wear her the dosemeter (Personal Protective Equipment) too?!
I also agree, a worrying (or perhaps poorly contrived) statement from Mr Hassell. The implication from this could be that if we can't meet the standards expected in human medicine, then we probably shouldn't be taking radiographs at all.
Agreed,; we service our machine annually and obtain a compliance certificate. I must say I think reporting him to the HSE is a pretty despicable thing for a colleague to do.
The RPS director either had something against Mr. Kenward already, or he was just covering his own butt.
Mr. Hassell should be obliged to expand and explain his statement, if he can. It wasn't even necessary: he could just have said "the regs say you mustn't expose humans, so the regs have been breached, no argument."
Probably the latter; God how I hate this profession now, can't wait to retire.
Good exposure!
petty beurocratic `more than my job`s worth` mentality. And the Xray machine would surely have been compliant with the IRR regs! I am afraid we are losing the battle and the pin stripes are winning!
wow, I do not think that I would want to be the fly on the wall in that practice, and yes, good exposure